What is a primary disadvantage of using mortars in combat?

The primary disadvantage of using mortars in combat, being that they have a limited range compared to conventional artillery, is significant for several reasons. Mortars, specifically the 81mm variety, are typically effective at shorter ranges, usually up to about 5,500 meters, depending on the type of ammunition used and the specific mortar system. In contrast, conventional artillery can fire projectiles over much greater distances, often exceeding 30 kilometers.

This limitation in range can restrict the operational flexibility of mortar units on the battlefield. If enemy positions are located further away than a mortar can effectively engage, it may necessitate the deployment of other fire support capabilities, such as howitzers or rocket artillery, which can cover those distances. Additionally, a shorter range can make mortar units more vulnerable to enemy counter-battery fire, as their positions may be closer to the front lines compared to longer-range artillery units that can operate from a safer distance.

Understanding this context is critical for tactical planning during operations; commanders have to consider both the range and the effectiveness of their indirect fire support options to achieve mission objectives efficiently.